State v. Hall

219 N.W.2d 716

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hall. Read the opinion of the Court — 1975 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1055 →

Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 26, 1974·No. No. 55756·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of robbery with aggravation in violation of sections 711.1 and 711.2, The Code, 1971. He was sentenced thereon, and appeals. We affirm.

Defendant assigns as error the overruling of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and asserts there was insufficient evidence to sustain the verdict of guilty.

We have reviewed the record and are satisfied there was sufficient evidence to justify the submission of the case to the jury. This case is now affirmed. See rule 348.1, Rules of Civil Procedure.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of robbery with aggravation in violation of sections 711.1 and 711.2, The Code, 1971. He was sentenced thereon, and appeals. We affirm.

Defendant assigns as error the overruling of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and asserts there was insufficient evidence to sustain the verdict of guilty.

We have reviewed the record and are satisfied there was sufficient evidence to justify the submission of the case to the jury. This case is now affirmed. See rule 348.1, Rules of Civil Procedure.

Affirmed.

State v. Hall, 219 N.W.2d 716 (iowa 1974).

Pincite

219 N.W.2d 716 (State v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.