State v. Hale
894 N.E.2d 53, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1459
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hale. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 Ohio St. 3d 1450 →
Opinion
Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-04-54857. This cause came on for further consideration of appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel to file an application to reopen. Upon consideration thereof,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and that Dennis L. Sipe of Marietta, Ohio, is appointed to represent the appellant in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hale, 894 N.E.2d 53, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1459 (Ohio 2008).
894 N.E.2d 53 (State v. Hale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.