State v. Hal
This text of 974 P.2d 793 (State v. Hal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction, challenging only the trial court’s imposition of a probation sentence consecutive to a sentence that included post-prison supervision. We heard oral argument and took the case under advisement. In the meantime, defendant filed a motion in the trial court to modify the judgment to correct an error in the sentence, pursuant to ORS 138.083. The trial court allowed the motion, granting defendant the same relief that she pursues in this appeal. The appeal is therefore moot and, on that ground, is dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
974 P.2d 793, 158 Or. App. 517, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hal-orctapp-1999.