State v. Hal

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Hal

974 P.2d 793, 158 Or. App. 517, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 208

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 17, 1999·No. 96-12-39650; CA A99004·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction, challenging only the trial court’s imposition of a probation sentence consecutive to a sentence that included post-prison supervision. We heard oral argument and took the case under advisement. In the meantime, defendant filed a motion in the trial court to modify the judgment to correct an error in the sentence, pursuant to ORS 138.083. The trial court allowed the motion, granting defendant the same relief that she pursues in this appeal. The appeal is therefore moot and, on that ground, is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction, challenging only the trial court’s imposition of a probation sentence consecutive to a sentence that included post-prison supervision. We heard oral argument and took the case under advisement. In the meantime, defendant filed a motion in the trial court to modify the judgment to correct an error in the sentence, pursuant to ORS 138.083. The trial court allowed the motion, granting defendant the same relief that she pursues in this appeal. The appeal is therefore moot and, on that ground, is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

State v. Hal, 974 P.2d 793, 158 Or. App. 517, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 208 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

974 P.2d 793 (State v. Hal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related