State v. Haith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Haith

194 S.E.2d 868, 17 N.C. App. 597, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1423

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Haith. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 N.C. App. 552 →

Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided March 14, 1973·No. No. 7315SC150·Published

Opinion

HEDRICK, Judge.

The defendant, Ralph M. Haith, was charged in a bill of indictment, proper in form, with felonious escape.

The record affirmatively discloses that the defendant, represented by court appointed counsel, freely, understandingly, and voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charge of felonious escape. The judgment imposing a prison sentence of twenty-four months is within the limits prescribed by statute for the offense charged. G.S. 148-45.

We have carefully reviewed the record and no prejudicial error appears on the face thereof. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Judges Britt and Parker concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HEDRICK, Judge.

The defendant, Ralph M. Haith, was charged in a bill of indictment, proper in form, with felonious escape.

The record affirmatively discloses that the defendant, represented by court appointed counsel, freely, understandingly, and voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charge of felonious escape. The judgment imposing a prison sentence of twenty-four months is within the limits prescribed by statute for the offense charged. G.S. 148-45.

We have carefully reviewed the record and no prejudicial error appears on the face thereof. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Judges Britt and Parker concur.

State v. Haith, 194 S.E.2d 868, 17 N.C. App. 597, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1423 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

194 S.E.2d 868 (State v. Haith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.