State v. Hairston
This text of 102 S.E.2d 782 (State v. Hairston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only question raised by the-appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to make out a case for the jury. While the quantity of liquor found in the defendant’s apartment was not sufficient to make out a prima facie case she had it for sale; nevertheless, the varieties of the beverage available in the apartment, evidence that a number of different bottles had been opened and the contents partially consumed, the time of the night and the number of persons present, the number of two-ounce glasses, together with other facts and circumstances, taken together constitute sufficient evidence to sustain the jury’s finding.
Ño Error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 S.E.2d 782, 248 N.C. 213, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hairston-nc-1958.