State v. Haight

217 P.3d 755, 166 Wash. 2d 1025, 2009 Wash. LEXIS 772
Washington Supreme Court·Decided September 9, 2009·No. 83113-1·Published

Opinion

217 P.3d 755 (2009)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Roger Lee HAIGHT, Petitioner.

No. 83113-1.

Supreme Court of Washington.

September 9, 2009.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices Madsen, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered this matter at its September 8, 2009, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file Petition for Review is granted. The Petition for Review is granted and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Arizona v. Gant, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009).

/s/ Gerry L. Alexander Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Haight, 217 P.3d 755, 166 Wash. 2d 1025, 2009 Wash. LEXIS 772 (Wash. 2009).

217 P.3d 755 (State v. Haight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arizona v. Gant
556 U.S. 332 (Supreme Court, 2009)