State v. Haight
This text of 217 P.3d 755 (State v. Haight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Roger Lee HAIGHT, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices Madsen, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered this matter at its September 8, 2009, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 The Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file Petition for Review is granted. The Petition for Review is granted and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Arizona v. Gant, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009).
/s/ Gerry L. Alexander Chief JusticeFree access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 P.3d 755, 166 Wash. 2d 1025, 2009 Wash. LEXIS 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-haight-wash-2009.