State v. Haight

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Haight

398 S.W.3d 89, 2013 WL 1802640, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 534

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 30, 2013·No. No. WD 74746·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Kevin B. Haight appeals his conviction, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, of forcible rape. Mr. Haight argues that the trial court erred in sustaining an evidentiary objection by the State. Finding no error, we affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Kevin B. Haight appeals his conviction, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, of forcible rape. Mr. Haight argues that the trial court erred in sustaining an evidentiary objection by the State. Finding no error, we affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Haight, 398 S.W.3d 89, 2013 WL 1802640, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 534 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

398 S.W.3d 89 (State v. Haight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.