State v. Haggerty

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Haggerty

58 A.2d 82, 137 N.J.L. 80, 1948 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 162

DecidedMarch 31, 1948

StatusPublished

This text of 58 A.2d 82 (State v. Haggerty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Haggerty, 58 A.2d 82, 137 N.J.L. 80, 1948 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 162 (N.J. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioners were indicted by the Atlantic County grand jury for an alleged violation of the statute against gambling. They now apply for certiorari to remove the indictments into the Supreme Court in order to move to quash.

By stipulation it appears that subsequent to the present application, the petitioners entered a plea of guilty and sentence was imposed thereon, by reason of which the questions sought to be raised on the writs of certiorari have become academic so far as the petitioners are concerned and consequently the applications are denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Petitioners were indicted by the Atlantic County grand jury for an alleged violation of the statute against gambling. They now apply for certiorari to remove the indictments into the Supreme Court in order to move to quash.

By stipulation it appears that subsequent to the present application, the petitioners entered a plea of guilty and sentence was imposed thereon, by reason of which the questions sought to be raised on the writs of certiorari have become academic so far as the petitioners are concerned and consequently the applications are denied, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.2d 82, 137 N.J.L. 80, 1948 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-haggerty-nj-1948.