State v. Haddock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Haddock

91 S.E.2d 573, 243 N.C. 630, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 575

DecidedFebruary 29, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E.2d 573 (State v. Haddock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Haddock, 91 S.E.2d 573, 243 N.C. 630, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 575 (N.C. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PeR Cueiam.

The State offered parol evidence of ownership and possession of the premises upon which the offenses charged in the indictments are alleged to have occurred. The court admitted the evidence over objection. However, substantially the same evidence was later admitted without objection — part of it brought out by defendant’s cross-examination. The objection, even if valid, was waived. The evidence was sufficient to carry the cases to the jury. Debatable questions of law are not raised by the assignments of error and discussion is not required. Examination of the record reveals

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PeR Cueiam.

The State offered parol evidence of ownership and possession of the premises upon which the offenses charged in the indictments are alleged to have occurred. The court admitted the evidence over objection. However, substantially the same evidence was later admitted without objection — part of it brought out by defendant’s cross-examination. The objection, even if valid, was waived. The evidence was sufficient to carry the cases to the jury. Debatable questions of law are not raised by the assignments of error and discussion is not required. Examination of the record reveals

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 S.E.2d 573, 243 N.C. 630, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-haddock-nc-1956.