State v. Haaf

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Haaf

208 N.W.2d 302, 296 Minn. 532, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1271

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 15, 1973·No. No. 44098·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The alternative writ of prohibition issued by this court in the above entitled matter on December 8, 1972, is herewith made absolute. Accordingly, the prosecution of James Haaf, arising out of an indictment dated January 5, 1972, charging him with committing the crime of bribery on November 9, 1970, in violation of Minn. St. 609.42, subd. 1(1), is permanently enjoined.

Because the court is divided on the reasons for reaching its conclusion, no opinion accompanies its decision.

Writ of prohibition made absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The alternative writ of prohibition issued by this court in the above entitled matter on December 8, 1972, is herewith made absolute. Accordingly, the prosecution of James Haaf, arising out of an indictment dated January 5, 1972, charging him with committing the crime of bribery on November 9, 1970, in violation of Minn. St. 609.42, subd. 1(1), is permanently enjoined.

Because the court is divided on the reasons for reaching its conclusion, no opinion accompanies its decision.

Writ of prohibition made absolute.

State v. Haaf, 208 N.W.2d 302, 296 Minn. 532, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1271 (Mich. 1973).

Pincite

208 N.W.2d 302 (State v. Haaf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.