State v. Haaf

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Haaf

208 N.W.2d 302, 296 Minn. 532, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1271

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJune 15, 1973

DocketNo. 44098

StatusPublished

This text of 208 N.W.2d 302 (State v. Haaf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Haaf, 208 N.W.2d 302, 296 Minn. 532, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1271 (Mich. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The alternative writ of prohibition issued by this court in the above entitled matter on December 8, 1972, is herewith made absolute. Accordingly, the prosecution of James Haaf, arising out of an indictment dated January 5, 1972, charging him with committing the crime of bribery on November 9, 1970, in violation of Minn. St. 609.42, subd. 1(1), is permanently enjoined.

Because the court is divided on the reasons for reaching its conclusion, no opinion accompanies its decision.

Writ of prohibition made absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The alternative writ of prohibition issued by this court in the above entitled matter on December 8, 1972, is herewith made absolute. Accordingly, the prosecution of James Haaf, arising out of an indictment dated January 5, 1972, charging him with committing the crime of bribery on November 9, 1970, in violation of Minn. St. 609.42, subd. 1(1), is permanently enjoined.

Because the court is divided on the reasons for reaching its conclusion, no opinion accompanies its decision.

Writ of prohibition made absolute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 N.W.2d 302, 296 Minn. 532, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-haaf-minn-1973.