State v. H. M. T.
This text of 316 P.3d 433 (State v. H. M. T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that, because of a mental disorder, she is unable to provide for her basic personal needs and is not receiving the care necessary for her health or safety. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
316 P.3d 433, 260 Or. App. 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-h-m-t-orctapp-2013.