State v. H. B. S.

464 P.3d 171, 304 Or. App. 545
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJune 3, 2020
DocketA171264
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 464 P.3d 171 (State v. H. B. S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. H. B. S., 464 P.3d 171, 304 Or. App. 545 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Submitted April 28, affirmed June 3, 2020

In the Matter of H. B. S., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. H. B. S., Appellant. Lane County Circuit Court 19CC02299; A171264 464 P3d 171

Maurice K. Merten, Judge. Alexander C. Cambier and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jordan R. Silk, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and Powers, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. D. R., 239 Or App 576, 244 P3d 916 (2010).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. K. R. B.
464 P.3d 171 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
464 P.3d 171, 304 Or. App. 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-h-b-s-orctapp-2020.