State v. Gwyn

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Gwyn

172 S.E.2d 105, 7 N.C. App. 397, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1701

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedFebruary 25, 1970

Docket7019SC88

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 172 S.E.2d 105 (State v. Gwyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gwyn, 172 S.E.2d 105, 7 N.C. App. 397, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1701 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Mallard, C.J.

The evidence for the State tended to show that in Randolph County on 13 May 1969 between six and seven o’clock p.m. the defendant, using a “sawed-off shotgun,” robbed the victim of between twelve and fourteen hundred dollars. The evidence for the defendant tended to show that he was not in Randolph County at any time on the date of 13 May 1969 and did not rob the victim of any money.

Defendant makes no assignments of error based on exceptions properly taken. However, an appeal is an exception to the judgment, presenting the face of the record proper for review. State *398 v. Elliott, 269 N.C. 683, 153 S.E. 2d 330 (1967). The record proper in this criminal case consists of the bill of indictment charging the defendant with armed robbery, the defendant’s plea of not guilty, the verdict of the jury, and the judgment imposed. State v. Stubbs, 265 N.C. 420, 144 S.E. 2d 262 (1965); State v. Moore, 6 N.C. App. 596, 170 S.E. 2d 568 (1969). The bill of indictment appears to be proper in form. Upon the defendant’s plea of not guilty, the trial was properly by jury. There was no error in the jury’s verdict. The sentence to imprisonment for not less than fourteen years nor more than eighteen years is not excessive under the statute, G.S. 14-87, which provides that the punishment for the felony of armed robbery shall be imprisonment for not less than five nor more than thirty years.

In the trial we find

No error.

MoRRis and Vaughk, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mallard, C.J.

The evidence for the State tended to show that in Randolph County on 13 May 1969 between six and seven o’clock p.m. the defendant, using a “sawed-off shotgun,” robbed the victim of between twelve and fourteen hundred dollars. The evidence for the defendant tended to show that he was not in Randolph County at any time on the date of 13 May 1969 and did not rob the victim of any money.

Defendant makes no assignments of error based on exceptions properly taken. However, an appeal is an exception to the judgment, presenting the face of the record proper for review. State *398 v. Elliott, 269 N.C. 683, 153 S.E. 2d 330 (1967). The record proper in this criminal case consists of the bill of indictment charging the defendant with armed robbery, the defendant’s plea of not guilty, the verdict of the jury, and the judgment imposed. State v. Stubbs, 265 N.C. 420, 144 S.E. 2d 262 (1965); State v. Moore, 6 N.C. App. 596, 170 S.E. 2d 568 (1969). The bill of indictment appears to be proper in form. Upon the defendant’s plea of not guilty, the trial was properly by jury. There was no error in the jury’s verdict. The sentence to imprisonment for not less than fourteen years nor more than eighteen years is not excessive under the statute, G.S. 14-87, which provides that the punishment for the felony of armed robbery shall be imprisonment for not less than five nor more than thirty years.

In the trial we find

No error.

MoRRis and Vaughk, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 S.E.2d 105, 7 N.C. App. 397, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gwyn-ncctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack