State v. Guzek

749 P.2d 618, 89 Or. App. 567, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 214
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 17, 1988
DocketCR7-0291-20; CA A44562
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 749 P.2d 618 (State v. Guzek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Guzek, 749 P.2d 618, 89 Or. App. 567, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 214 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant seeks modification of the sentence imposed for driving under the influence of intoxicants. He contends that the court erred by ordering that he repay the state for court-appointed attorney fees in excess of the amount actually paid to defense counsel. ORS 161.665(1). The state concedes that fees were limited by the local public defender contract to $265 and that the court erred by ordering defendant to pay $510.1 We modify the judgment.

Judgment modified to reduce the amount defendant is to pay for court-appointed attorney fees to $265; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gruver
906 P.2d 852 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)
State v. Weaver
847 P.2d 416 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
749 P.2d 618, 89 Or. App. 567, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-guzek-orctapp-1988.