State v. Guyton

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Guyton. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Haw. 372
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided May 6, 2015·No. SCWC-13-0000203·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000203 06-MAY-2015 09:57 AM

SCWC-13-0000203

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

EVANS NATHAN GUYTON, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0000203; CASE NO.2DCW-12-0000362)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Evans Nathan Guyton’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on March 27, 2015, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 06, 2015.

James S. Tabe /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Guyton, (haw 2015).

State v. Guyton (State v. Guyton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.