State v. Guyott
26 Mo. 62
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The bill of exceptions contains nothing but one instruction, which we can not review for the reason that the evidence is not preserved. (State v. Vaughn, 26 Mo. 29.)
The indictment is good. If the name of the slave or his owner or master was unknown to the grand jury, it was sufficient to state the fact in the indictment. (State v. Harris, 2 Snead, 224; State v. Miller, 7 Ired. 275; 13 Mo. 246; 14 14 Mo. 340; 15 Mo. 430.) The other judges concurring, the judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Guyott, 26 Mo. 62 (Mo. 1857).
26 Mo. 62 (State v. Guyott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hays v. State
13 Mo. 246 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1850)
State v. Bryant
14 Mo. 340 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1851)
State v. Ladd
15 Mo. 430 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1852)
State v. Vaughn
26 Mo. 29 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1857)