State v. Gustavo Martinez
This text of State v. Gustavo Martinez (State v. Gustavo Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gustavo
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 25, 2014
No. 04-14-00235-CR
The STATE of Texas, Appellant
v.
Gustavo MARTINEZ, Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 15, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. CC341867 The Honorable Michael La Hood, Judge Presiding
ORDER After the trial court granted the defendant’s motion to suppress, the State timely filed a written request for finding of fact and conclusions of law. The court of criminal appeals held in State v. Cullen that, “upon request of the losing party on a motion to suppress evidence, the trial court shall state its essential findings. By ‘essential findings’ we mean that the trial court must make findings of fact and conclusions of law adequate to provide an appellate court with a basis upon which to the review the trial court’s application of the law to the facts.” State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We have reviewed the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record to determine if the trial court made the requested findings and conclusions. See id. (holding findings and conclusions need to be recorded in some way, whether written out and filed by the trial court, or stated on the record at the hearing). No findings of fact or conclusions of law related to the motion to suppress appear in the appellate record.
The State has filed a motion to abate the appeal to permit the trial court to make the requested findings of fact and conclusions of law. TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4; State v. Elias, 339 S.W.3d 667, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (when timely request for findings of fact and conclusions of law was made, appellate court must abate the appeal and remand case to trial court). The State’s motion is GRANTED.
Accordingly, this appeal is ABATED, and the trial court is ORDERED to make findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to the motion to suppress within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. The findings of fact and conclusions of law may be in the form of written findings or oral findings made at a hearing in open court with all counsel present. If the trial court makes written findings, we ORDER the trial court clerk to prepare and file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s written findings on or before the fifteenth (15th) day from the date of the trial court’s findings. If the trial court makes oral findings on the record in open court, we ORDER the court reporter to prepare and file a supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing on or before the fifteenth (15th) day from the date of the hearing. All appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court.
The Clerk of this court is instructed to serve a copy of this order on the trial court, the trial court clerk, the court reporter, and all counsel.
_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25th day of June, 2014.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Gustavo Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gustavo-martinez-texapp-2014.