State v. Gunter

215 P.3d 875, 229 Or. App. 714, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1019

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant requests reconsideration of this court’s decision in State v. Gunter, 227 Or App 152, 205 P3d 84 (2009). Defendant argues that, in our opinion affirming his convictions and sentences, we failed to address several arguments concerning sentencing that were made in defendant’s opening brief on appeal. Defendant requests that we consider those arguments now. We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments that the court erred in imposing sentence on defendant. A discussion of those arguments would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public. Accordingly, we modify our previous opinion to add that we reject defendant’s previously unaddressed sentencing arguments without discussion.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.