State v. Gunter

194 S.W.3d 370, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 913, 2006 WL 1735109
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 27, 2006·No. No. WD 65440·Published

Opinion

ORDER

David Gunter appeals his conviction in a bench trial for the class D felony of driving while intoxicated and as a persistent intoxication-related offender. His sole point on appeal contends that the trial court erred in permitting the prosecutor to argue in closing that Mr. Gunter’s trial testimony was untruthful. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Gunter, 194 S.W.3d 370, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 913, 2006 WL 1735109 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

194 S.W.3d 370 (State v. Gunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.