State v. Gundell

315 So. 2d 450, 1975 Fla. LEXIS 3636
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 16, 1975·No. No. 46235·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we are asked to review a decision of the First District Court of Appeal, reported at 298 So.2d 504, construing the so-called “speedy trial” rule set forth in Rule 3.191(a)(2), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and exercising the power of habeas corpus. We accepted jurisdiction based on direct conflict with our recent decision in State v. Hill, 313 So.2d 766, filed on March 19, 1975. Our opinion in Hill quashed a district court decision on which the lower court here relied.1

Our decision in Hill governs this proceeding in all respects, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Hill.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Gundell, 315 So. 2d 450, 1975 Fla. LEXIS 3636 (Fla. 1975).

315 So. 2d 450 (State v. Gundell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hill
299 So. 2d 625 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
State v. Hill
313 So. 2d 766 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
State v. Gundell
298 So. 2d 504 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)