State v. Gunberg
552 P.2d 268, 26 Or. App. 357, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1710
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 2, 1976·No. No. C 74-12-3854 Cr, CA 6094·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Counsel have stipulated:
"It appearing to counsel for appellant and respondent herein that defendant-appellant’s sentence as a dangerous offender is erroneous, in that the judgment order herein imposes an additional sentence for being a dangerous offender, instead of enhancing the sentence for the underlying offenses:
"IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between counsel for appellant and respondent that the judgment herein should be vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing.”
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Gunberg, 552 P.2d 268, 26 Or. App. 357, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1710 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).
552 P.2d 268 (State v. Gunberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Addicks
560 P.2d 1095 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)