State v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.

118 S.W. 736, 55 Tex. Civ. App. 108, 1909 Tex. App. LEXIS 294
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 7, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 118 S.W. 736 (State v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co., 118 S.W. 736, 55 Tex. Civ. App. 108, 1909 Tex. App. LEXIS 294 (Tex. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

FISHER, Chief Justice.

Statement of the Nature and Result of Suit.—This suit was instituted by the State of Texas, through her Attorney-General, R. Y. Davidson, the said Attorney-General acting by authority and under instructions from the Railroad Commission of Texas, against the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fa Railway Company for penalties for failure and refusal tti comply with the following special orders, to wit:

“Office of Railroad Commission of Texas.
“Austin, Texas, July 31,' 1907.
“Special Order:
Under the authority conferred upon it by article 4571 of the Revised Statutes of Texas, it is hereby ordered by the Railroad Commission of Texas that the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company be and it is hereby ordered and required to compile and file with this Commission, on or before September 15, 1909, a full and complete statement in the manner and form prescribed below and showing the following information, to wit:
“The total number of all freight cars handled at Houston, Waco, . . . during the months of October, 1905, and June, 1906.
“State separately the number of cars originating at and forwarded from above named stations; the number of cars received and destined to above stations; the number of passing cars delivered to and received from connecting lines.
*109 “Separate statements shall he made for each station and for each month.
Allison Mayfield, Chairman.
L. J. Storey,
O. B. Colquitt,
Commissioners.
“Attest:
E. B. McLean;
Secretary.”
“Office of Bailroad Commission of Texas.
“Austin, Texas, August 1, 1901.
“Special Order:
tinder the authority conferred upon it by article 4511 of the Be-vised Statutes of Texas, it is hereby ordered by the Bailroad Commission of Texas that the Company be 'and it is hereby ordered and required to file with this Commission on or before September 15, 1901, a full and complete statement showing the amounts paid and charged to ‘Legal -Expenses’ for each year for a period of five years ending with June 30, 1901, in the manner and form prescribed below, to wit:
“1.—Salaries of general attorney, assistants, clerks and office expenses.
“2.—Actual traveling expenses of general attorney, assistants and clerks.
“3.—Other expenses of general attorney, assistants and clerks, giving details of each item of such expense.
“4.—Amount paid as fees to attorneys other than general attorneys and assistants.
“5.—Amount paid for court costs and witness fees.
“6.—All other expenses incidental to the trial and settlement of law suits to be given in detail.
“1.—Amount of expenses of general attorney, assistants and other employes in attendance on legislative bodies, State and National, to be stated separately, and each item of expenses to be shown in detail.
“8.—Amount paid as proportion of salaries of solicitors, attorneys and their assistants of owning system and holding company charged to or paid by Texas Company.
“9.—Amount paid as proportion of expenses of solicitors, attorneys and their assistants of owning system and holding company, to be itemized.
“10.—Amount paid for any other purpose, including expense of attendance on sessions of Texas Bailroad Commission, sessions of Interstate Commerce Commission, donations and contributions of all kinds; these amounts to be shown in detail.
Allison Mayfield, Chairman.
L. J. Storey,
O. B. Colquitt,
“Attest: Commissioners.
E. B. McLean;
Secretary.”
*110 “Office of the Railroad Commission of Texas.
“Austin, Texas, August 27, 1907.
“It is ordered hy the Railroad Commission of Texas that the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Re Railway Company shall file with the Commission not later than October 1, 1907, a statement, the correctness of which shall be sworn to by the auditor of said Railway Company, showing the earnings of said company on the cotton hauled by it for the year beginning July 1, 1905, and ending with June 30, 1906, as follows:
“1st. The gross earnings received by' said company for hauling cotton.
“2d. The gross earnings received by said company for hauling cotton which had origin and destination in Texas and credited to intrastate earnings.
“3d. The gross earnings received by said company on all cotton hauled by it under interstate or foreign bills of lading and credited to interstate earnings.
“4th. The gross earnings on all cotton hauled by said Railway Company originating in Texas under bills of lading which did not name an interstate or foreign destination, but did name destination at a point in Teias, and which earnings were credited to interstate traffic.
“Explanation: The amount of earnings on concentrated cotton to be included in gross earnings shall be that remaining after concentration charge adjustments have been made:
Allison Mayfield, Chairman.
L. J. Storey,
O. B. Colquitt,
Commissioners.
“Attest:
E. R. McLean,
Secretary.”

In the petition of the plaintiff it was alleged that the said orders were duly and legally made and entered under the provisions of article 4571 of the Revised Statutes, and that notices thereof were duly and legally served on the defendant, but that the defendant failed and refused to comply with the terms and provisions of said orders and failed and refused to furnish the information requested in said orders.

The defendant, The Gulf, Colorado & Santa Re Railway Company, answered by a general and special exception and also by a general denial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Borschow v. Waples-Platter Grocer Co.
223 S.W. 872 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Gregg v. Public Service Commission
87 A. 1111 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 S.W. 736, 55 Tex. Civ. App. 108, 1909 Tex. App. LEXIS 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gulf-colorado-santa-fe-railway-co-texapp-1909.