State v. Guillard

817 So. 2d 1121, 2002 La. LEXIS 1079, 2002 WL 539123
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 12, 2002
DocketNo. 2000-KP-2540
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 817 So. 2d 1121 (State v. Guillard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Guillard, 817 So. 2d 1121, 2002 La. LEXIS 1079, 2002 WL 539123 (La. 2002).

Opinions

CALOGERO, C.J., and JOHNSON, J., concur in the denial of writ and assign the following reasons.

The court of appeal opinion upsets the district court’s sentence and remands the case for the imposition of a new sentence. After remand to the district court, Relator will be afforded the opportunity to appeal the conviction and newly imposed sentence and have both the conviction and sentence examined on appeal. That being the case, we agree to the denial of Relator’s writ application without resolving whether or not the court of appeal has erred in upset[1122]*1122ting the district court’s ten-year sentence. For the foregoing reasons, we concur in the denial of the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Guillard
902 So. 2d 1061 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
817 So. 2d 1121, 2002 La. LEXIS 1079, 2002 WL 539123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-guillard-la-2002.