State v. Guffey

176 N.W. 521, 42 S.D. 532, 1920 S.D. LEXIS 30
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 19, 1920
DocketFile No. 4610
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 176 N.W. 521 (State v. Guffey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Guffey, 176 N.W. 521, 42 S.D. 532, 1920 S.D. LEXIS 30 (S.D. 1920).

Opinion

SMITH, J.

This is a direct appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss a criminal prosecution against appellant. The motion was founded upon section 630, Code Crim. Proc. 1903 (Rev. Code 1919, § 4808), which provides that:

“If a defendant, prosecuted for a public offense, whose trial 'has not been postponed upon his application, is not brought to trial at the next term 'of court in which the indictment or information is triable, the court must order the prosecution to be dismissed, unless good cause to the contrary is shown.”

[533]*533There is no provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure permitting a review, upon direct appeal, of an order, of a trial court made upon a motion- to dismiss a prosecution under this section. This court, therefore, is without jurisdiction to consider the questions of law or to review the facts attempted to be presented upon this purported appeal. State v. Stunkard, 28 S. D. 311, 133 N. W. 253; State v. Taylor, 37 S. D. 229, 157 N. W. 819; section 5031, Rev. Code 1919.

The appeal is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Davis
86 N.W.2d 174 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1957)
State v. Sweeney
203 N.W. 460 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 N.W. 521, 42 S.D. 532, 1920 S.D. LEXIS 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-guffey-sd-1920.