State v. Guest

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Guest

239 S.W.3d 178, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1622, 2007 WL 4166047

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Guest. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 778 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 27, 2007·No. ED 89151·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Christine Guest, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of committing violence to another offender housed in a department correctional center. The trial court sen *179 tenced defendant, as a prior and persistent offender, to six years’ imprisonment.

In her sole point on appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence because there was no proof of the corpus delicti. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Christine Guest, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of committing violence to another offender housed in a department correctional center. The trial court sen *179 tenced defendant, as a prior and persistent offender, to six years’ imprisonment.

In her sole point on appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence because there was no proof of the corpus delicti. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Guest, 239 S.W.3d 178, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1622, 2007 WL 4166047 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

239 S.W.3d 178 (State v. Guest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.