State v. Guerra

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Guerra

245 So. 2d 889, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6950

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 23, 1971

DocketNo. 70-887

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 245 So. 2d 889 (State v. Guerra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Guerra, 245 So. 2d 889, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6950 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the State of Florida from a judgment dismissing a second information upon the ground that the prosecution was barred by the statute of limitations, see F.S. § 932.05, F.S.A. The record reveals clearly that the crime, if committed, occurred in September of 1966; that the first information which was filed in September of 1968 (two days before the expiration of the statute) was dismissed upon the State’s motion for a nolle prosequi, solely because the State was not ready to proceed with trial. Under these circumstances, the second information which was filed in February of 1970, was beyond the period provided by the statute. Cf. Mead v. State, Fla. 1958, 101 So.2d 373; Pena v. Schultz, Fla.1971, 245 So.2d 49 (released Feb. 24, 1971); State ex rel. Bird v. Stedman, Fla.App. 1969, 223 So.2d 85.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the State of Florida from a judgment dismissing a second information upon the ground that the prosecution was barred by the statute of limitations, see F.S. § 932.05, F.S.A. The record reveals clearly that the crime, if committed, occurred in September of 1966; that the first information which was filed in September of 1968 (two days before the expiration of the statute) was dismissed upon the State’s motion for a nolle prosequi, solely because the State was not ready to proceed with trial. Under these circumstances, the second information which was filed in February of 1970, was beyond the period provided by the statute. Cf. Mead v. State, Fla. 1958, 101 So.2d 373; Pena v. Schultz, Fla.1971, 245 So.2d 49 (released Feb. 24, 1971); State ex rel. Bird v. Stedman, Fla.App. 1969, 223 So.2d 85.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 So. 2d 889, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-guerra-fladistctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack