State v. Guardiola

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Guardiola

304 S.W.3d 804, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 330, 2010 WL 908489

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 16, 2010·No. WD 70112·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Randy Guardiola appeals his convictions of resisting arrest, section 575.150, RSMo Cum.Supp.2008, and two counts of assault of a law enforcement officer in the third degree, section 565.083, RSMo Cum.Supp. 2008, and concurrent sentences of four years imprisonment and two one-year terms in the county jail, respectively. Guardiola raises three points on appeal regarding the exclusion of evidence, closing argument, and sufficiency of the evidence to support the resisting arrest conviction. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Randy Guardiola appeals his convictions of resisting arrest, section 575.150, RSMo Cum.Supp.2008, and two counts of assault of a law enforcement officer in the third degree, section 565.083, RSMo Cum.Supp. 2008, and concurrent sentences of four years imprisonment and two one-year terms in the county jail, respectively. Guardiola raises three points on appeal regarding the exclusion of evidence, closing argument, and sufficiency of the evidence to support the resisting arrest conviction. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Guardiola, 304 S.W.3d 804, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 330, 2010 WL 908489 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

304 S.W.3d 804 (State v. Guardiola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related