State v. Gruich

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Gruich

112 A. 594, 95 N.J.L. 263, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 283

DecidedNovember 8, 1920

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A. 594 (State v. Gruich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gruich, 112 A. 594, 95 N.J.L. 263, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 283 (N.J. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Per CuRIAM.

We agree with the Supreme Court as to- the only point discussed in its opinion. It was not necessary to discuss the alleged error in excluding Hunter’s testimony, as the inquiry was afterward taken up by the state and answered. Let the judgment be affirmed.

For affirmance — Swayze, TeeNchaRd, BergeN, Ivaliscti, IyATZENBACH, WHITE, HePPENHEIMBR, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, ACKERSON, JJ. 11. For reversal — -None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per CuRIAM.

We agree with the Supreme Court as to- the only point discussed in its opinion. It was not necessary to discuss the alleged error in excluding Hunter’s testimony, as the inquiry was afterward taken up by the state and answered. Let the judgment be affirmed.

For affirmance — Swayze, TeeNchaRd, BergeN, Ivaliscti, IyATZENBACH, WHITE, HePPENHEIMBR, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, ACKERSON, JJ. 11. For reversal — -None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A. 594, 95 N.J.L. 263, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gruich-nj-1920.