Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Grubb

State v. Grubb

629 So. 2d 325, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 109, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 76
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 7, 1994
DocketNo. 93-2515
StatusPublished

This text of 629 So. 2d 325 (State v. Grubb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Grubb, 629 So. 2d 325, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 109, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 76 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state brings this petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the trial court’s order appointing the Office of the Public Defender to represent a juvenile in a delinquency disposition. We considered this issue in two other cases and remanded for consideration of all the statutory criteria required before defense is conducted at the cost of [326]*326public funds. In both cases, the parent had not been contacted prior to the appointment of the public defender; that is the same circumstance that exists in this case. State v. Edge, 621 So.2d 586 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); State v. D.V.S., 617 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED; REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. D.V.S.
617 So. 2d 1162 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
629 So. 2d 325, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 109, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-grubb-fladistctapp-1994.