State v. Grover

555 A.2d 476, 1989 Me. LEXIS 49
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided March 6, 1989·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

On September 4, 1985, James E. Grover was convicted of selling cocaine in a jury trial held in Superior Court (Franklin Coun[477] ty; McKinley, J.). In this, his second appeal before the Law Court he alleges that the Superior Court (Franklin County; McKinley, J.) committed reversible error in denying his motion for a new trial.

The facts leading to Grover’s conviction for selling cocaine are laid out in State v. Grover (Grover I), 518 A.2d 1039 (Me. 1986). After his conviction, Grover brought a motion for a new trial based on the discovery that the sole witness for the prosecution, a police officer, admitted to falsifying police reports to protect informants. After hearing on the motion, the Superior Court determined that because the falsification was on a different case the defense had not proved that if admitted the evidence would have resulted in a different verdict.

The decision not to grant the motion for a new trial was not clear error and will not be disturbed. State v. Hardy, 501 A.2d 815, 816 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Grover, 555 A.2d 476, 1989 Me. LEXIS 49 (Me. 1989).

555 A.2d 476 (State v. Grover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Grover
518 A.2d 1039 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1986)
State v. Hardy
501 A.2d 815 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)