State v. Group

784 N.E.2d 113, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1466
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Group. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 Ohio St. 3d 248
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 24, 2003·No. 1999-1152·Published

Opinion

Mahoning C.P. No. 97CR66. Upon consideration of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay execution in the above-styled cause pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies, and it appearing from the exhibits to the motion that post-conviction proceedings are pending,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that execution of sentence be, and hereby is, stayed, pending the exhaustion of all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state, including any appeals.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the appellant and for the appellee shall notify this court when all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state have been exhausted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Group, 784 N.E.2d 113, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1466 (Ohio 2003).

784 N.E.2d 113 (State v. Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.