State v. Group

784 N.E.2d 113, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1466
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 24, 2003
Docket1999-1152
StatusPublished

This text of 784 N.E.2d 113 (State v. Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Group, 784 N.E.2d 113, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1466 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

Mahoning C.P. No. 97CR66. Upon consideration of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay execution in the above-styled cause pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies, and it appearing from the exhibits to the motion that post-conviction proceedings are pending,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that execution of sentence be, and hereby is, stayed, pending the exhaustion of all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state, including any appeals.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the appellant and for the appellee shall notify this court when all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state have been exhausted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
784 N.E.2d 113, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-group-ohio-2003.