State v. Grossmick
379 A.2d 453, 75 N.J. 48, 1977 N.J. LEXIS 255
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, 153 N. J. Super. 190.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford and Schreiber — 6.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Grossmick, 379 A.2d 453, 75 N.J. 48, 1977 N.J. LEXIS 255 (N.J. 1977).
379 A.2d 453 (State v. Grossmick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
State v. Walker
737 A.2d 701 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1999)
State v. Davis
550 A.2d 1241 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1988)
State, in Interest of Rr
398 A.2d 76 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1979)
State v. Zamorsky
387 A.2d 1227 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)