State v. Gross

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Gross

28 P.3d 1243, 175 Or. App. 476, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1059

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 25, 2001

Docket970387AC1; A109149

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 P.3d 1243 (State v. Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gross, 28 P.3d 1243, 175 Or. App. 476, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1059 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this probation violation proceeding, the trial court advised defendant that he had a right to be represented by an attorney and that one would be appointed to represent him if he could not afford to hire one. The court then asked defendant if he understood the nature of the charges against him. Defendant replied in the affirmative and admitted the charges. The trial court did not advise him of the consequences of self-representation. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in failing to provide that advice. The state concedes the error. We accept the concession. State v. Alt, 111 Or App 633, 634, 825 P2d 661 (1992).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this probation violation proceeding, the trial court advised defendant that he had a right to be represented by an attorney and that one would be appointed to represent him if he could not afford to hire one. The court then asked defendant if he understood the nature of the charges against him. Defendant replied in the affirmative and admitted the charges. The trial court did not advise him of the consequences of self-representation. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in failing to provide that advice. The state concedes the error. We accept the concession. State v. Alt, 111 Or App 633, 634, 825 P2d 661 (1992).

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 P.3d 1243, 175 Or. App. 476, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gross-orctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack