State v. Gross

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Gross

301 S.W.3d 541, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1794, 2009 WL 4784760

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 15, 2009

DocketWD 70967

StatusPublished

This text of 301 S.W.3d 541 (State v. Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gross, 301 S.W.3d 541, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1794, 2009 WL 4784760 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David Gross appeals the judgment of the trial court making a bond forfeiture absolute and denying his Rule 74.06 motion to set aside. He claims that (1) prosecutor did not file a writ of scire facias or a motion for bond forfeiture, and (2) he did not receive notice of the hearing. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David Gross appeals the judgment of the trial court making a bond forfeiture absolute and denying his Rule 74.06 motion to set aside. He claims that (1) prosecutor did not file a writ of scire facias or a motion for bond forfeiture, and (2) he did not receive notice of the hearing. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 S.W.3d 541, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1794, 2009 WL 4784760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gross-moctapp-2009.