State v. Gross

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Gross

301 S.W.3d 541, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1794, 2009 WL 4784760

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Gross. Read the opinion of the Court — 305 S.W.3d 506 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 2009·No. WD 70967·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David Gross appeals the judgment of the trial court making a bond forfeiture absolute and denying his Rule 74.06 motion to set aside. He claims that (1) prosecutor did not file a writ of scire facias or a motion for bond forfeiture, and (2) he did not receive notice of the hearing. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David Gross appeals the judgment of the trial court making a bond forfeiture absolute and denying his Rule 74.06 motion to set aside. He claims that (1) prosecutor did not file a writ of scire facias or a motion for bond forfeiture, and (2) he did not receive notice of the hearing. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Gross, 301 S.W.3d 541, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1794, 2009 WL 4784760 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

301 S.W.3d 541 (State v. Gross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.