Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. GROSHOLZ

State v. GROSHOLZ

706 S.E.2d 240, 365 N.C. 87
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 17, 2011
Docket311P10-2
StatusPublished

This text of 706 S.E.2d 240 (State v. GROSHOLZ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. GROSHOLZ, 706 S.E.2d 240, 365 N.C. 87 (N.C. 2011).

Opinion

706 S.E.2d 240 (2011)

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Gregory Scott GROSHOLZ.

No. 311P10-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 17, 2011.

Gregory S. Grosholz, for Grosholz, Gregory S.

Joan M. Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 16th of February 2011 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Brunswick County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of February 2011."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 S.E.2d 240, 365 N.C. 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-grosholz-nc-2011.