State v. Grip
2004 ME 156, 863 A.2d 276, 2004 Me. LEXIS 187
Opinion
[¶ 1] Ghe J. Grip appeals from the denial of his motion to compel compliance with 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1253(2) (Supp. 2004) by the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Marden, J.), arguing that he is entitled to more credit for pre-and post-trial detention time than the State certified. Contrary to his contention, and as we stated in State v. Crawford, we will not address the merits of a motion to enforce credit for time served that is brought outside post-conviction review proceedings. 2002 ME 113, ¶ 7, 801 A.2d 1002, 1004.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Grip, 2004 ME 156, 863 A.2d 276, 2004 Me. LEXIS 187 (Me. 2004).
2004 ME 156 (State v. Grip) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Crawford
2002 ME 113 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2002)