State v. Grip

2004 ME 156, 863 A.2d 276, 2004 Me. LEXIS 187
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedDecember 20, 2004
StatusPublished

This text of 2004 ME 156 (State v. Grip) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Grip, 2004 ME 156, 863 A.2d 276, 2004 Me. LEXIS 187 (Me. 2004).

Opinion

SAUFLEY, C.J.

[¶ 1] Ghe J. Grip appeals from the denial of his motion to compel compliance with 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1253(2) (Supp. 2004) by the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Marden, J.), arguing that he is entitled to more credit for pre-and post-trial detention time than the State certified. Contrary to his contention, and as we stated in State v. Crawford, we will not address the merits of a motion to enforce credit for time served that is brought outside post-conviction review proceedings. 2002 ME 113, ¶ 7, 801 A.2d 1002, 1004.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Crawford
2002 ME 113 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2004 ME 156, 863 A.2d 276, 2004 Me. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-grip-me-2004.