State v. Grindle

549 A.2d 370, 1988 Me. LEXIS 253
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided October 21, 1988·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Defendant, Christopher Grindle, appeals his convictions in Superior Court, (Penob-scot County; Beaulieu, J.), of five counts of burglary, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401 (1988) and three counts of theft, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 353 (1983). The trial justice committed no abuse of discretion in permitting a witness to testify about a conversation he had with Grindle outside the courtroom at the end of the first day of trial. State v. McEachern, 431 A.2d 39, 43 (Me.1981); State v. Lagasse, 410 A.2d 537, 541 (Me.1980). The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the state, supports the jury’s findings that the defendant committed the crimes of burglary and theft beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Grindle, 549 A.2d 370, 1988 Me. LEXIS 253 (Me. 1988).

549 A.2d 370 (State v. Grindle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lagasse
410 A.2d 537 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1980)
State v. Barry
495 A.2d 825 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)
State v. McEachern
431 A.2d 39 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1981)