State v. Grigsby

714 So. 2d 609, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8512, 1998 WL 391839
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 15, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2160
StatusPublished

This text of 714 So. 2d 609 (State v. Grigsby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Grigsby, 714 So. 2d 609, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8512, 1998 WL 391839 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

JOANOS, Judge.

On the court’s own motion, we withdraw our opinion which issued June 9, 1998, and substitute the following therefor. In our pri- or opinion, we reversed the trial court’s refusal to add eighteen “firearm” points to the sentencing guidelines scoresheet prepared for use at appellee’s sentencing on charges of possession of a firearm by a previously con[610]*610victed felon, and carrying a concealed weapon.

On June 12, 1998, the Florida Supreme Court released its decision in White v. State, 714 So.2d 440 (Fla.1998), in which the court accepted jurisdiction to resolve the conflict between decisions of the Second and Fourth District Courts of Appeal on the same legal issue raised by the State in this appeal. In White, our Florida Supreme Court approved the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Galloway v. State, 680 So.2d 616, 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). In Galloway, the Fourth District construed Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.702(d)(12) as inapplicable to convictions of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon or carrying a concealed firearm, where the offenses are unrelated to the commission of any additional substantive offense. In this case, as in Galloway, the defendant’s convictions of possession of a firearm by a previously convicted felon and carrying a concealed weapon were unrelated to commission of any other substantive offense.

Because the trial court’s sentencing disposition in this case was in accordance with the rationale set forth in Galloway, and approved by the supreme court in White, we affirm. See White v. State, 714 So.2d 440 (Fla.1998).

BARFIELD, C.J., and WOLF, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. State
714 So. 2d 440 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Galloway v. State
680 So. 2d 616 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
714 So. 2d 609, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8512, 1998 WL 391839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-grigsby-fladistctapp-1998.