State v. Griffith
This text of 213 N.W.2d 735 (State v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of unlawfully possessing amphetamines and sentenced to serve 2 years in the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex. He asserts that incorrect information was given the probation officer and reflected in the presentence report. Examination of the presentence report and the record fails to substantiate this contention. Neither does it disclose an abuse of discretion in denying probation. On the contrary, it discloses that this was not his first felony conviction.
This case falls within the purview of State v. Dovel, 189 Neb. 173, 201 N. W. 2d 820. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 N.W.2d 735, 191 Neb. 39, 1973 Neb. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-griffith-neb-1973.