State v. Griffith

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Griffith

160 S.W.3d 406, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 284, 2005 WL 406070

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 22, 2005

DocketED 83704

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 160 S.W.3d 406 (State v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Griffith, 160 S.W.3d 406, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 284, 2005 WL 406070 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Shannon Griffith (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction on multiple counts of first degree child molestation, sexual misconduct, and one count of child molestation in the second degree. Defendant claims there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction on counts one through five, concerning his molestation of C.P., a minor. Defendant also argues that the trial court erred in excluding certain testimony at trial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI