State v. Griffith

160 S.W.3d 406, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 284, 2005 WL 406070
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 22, 2005·No. ED 83704·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Shannon Griffith (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction on multiple counts of first degree child molestation, sexual misconduct, and one count of child molestation in the second degree. Defendant claims there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction on counts one through five, concerning his molestation of C.P., a minor. Defendant also argues that the trial court erred in excluding certain testimony at trial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Griffith, 160 S.W.3d 406, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 284, 2005 WL 406070 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

160 S.W.3d 406 (State v. Griffith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffith v. State
233 S.W.3d 774 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)