State v. Griffith
This text of 102 S.W. 1197 (State v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the 5th day of October, 1905, the prosecuting attorney of Pike county filed an information, charging the defendant with burglary and larceny. The date of the alleged offense was the 28th day of June, 1905, the building entered was the warehouse of the Diamond Flour Manufacturing Co., and the property stolen was two faucets of the value of two dollars. At the February term, 1906, of said court, the defendant was tried and convicted, and his punishment assessed at three years imprisonment in the penitentiary for the burglary and two years for the larceny. He was granted an appeal.
The defendant is not represented in this court. As there was no bill of exceptions filed, there is nothing before this court for review except the record proper, and that appears to be free from error.
The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 S.W. 1197, 203 Mo. 573, 1907 Mo. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-griffith-mo-1907.