Home/Idaho Supreme Court/State v. Griffith

State v. Griffith

774 P.2d 343, 116 Idaho 173, 1989 Ida. LEXIS 83
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedMay 17, 1989
Docket17905
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 774 P.2d 343 (State v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Griffith, 774 P.2d 343, 116 Idaho 173, 1989 Ida. LEXIS 83 (Idaho 1989).

Opinion

ON REVIEW

HUNTLEY, Justice.

The judgment and sentence of the district court is affirmed for the reasons articulated by the Court of Appeals.

SHEPARD, C.J., and BAKES, BISTLINE and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chris Lee and Sara Lee, individually, and on behalf of R.L. and T.L., their minor children v. Northwest Fiber, LLC, d/b/a Ziplyfiber; Ziply Fiber of Idaho, LLC; Ziply Fiber Northwest, LLC; HHS Construction, LLC; PG Engineering Management Corp d/b/a PG Contractors, LLC a/k/a PG Contractors Engineering Management Corp; Mastod’s Consulting Services, Inc.; Avista Corporation d/b/a Avista Utilities; Diego Vasquez d/b/a Ard Underground Construction, Does 1-10; and Doe Entities 1-10
D. Idaho, 2026
State v. Romero
815 P.2d 453 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1991)
State v. Broadhead
814 P.2d 401 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1991)
State v. Romero
815 P.2d 459 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
774 P.2d 343, 116 Idaho 173, 1989 Ida. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-griffith-idaho-1989.