Home/Idaho Supreme Court/State v. Griffith

State v. Griffith

774 P.2d 343, 116 Idaho 173, 1989 Ida. LEXIS 83
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided May 17, 1989·No. 17905·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ON REVIEW

HUNTLEY, Justice.

The judgment and sentence of the district court is affirmed for the reasons articulated by the Court of Appeals.

SHEPARD, C.J., and BAKES, BISTLINE and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Griffith, 774 P.2d 343, 116 Idaho 173, 1989 Ida. LEXIS 83 (Idaho 1989).

774 P.2d 343 (State v. Griffith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chris Lee and Sara Lee, individually, and on behalf of R.L. and T.L., their minor children v. Northwest Fiber, LLC, d/b/a Ziplyfiber; Ziply Fiber of Idaho, LLC; Ziply Fiber Northwest, LLC; HHS Construction, LLC; PG Engineering Management Corp d/b/a PG Contractors, LLC a/k/a PG Contractors Engineering Management Corp; Mastod’s Consulting Services, Inc.; Avista Corporation d/b/a Avista Utilities; Diego Vasquez d/b/a Ard Underground Construction, Does 1-10; and Doe Entities 1-10
D. Idaho, 2026
State v. Romero
815 P.2d 453 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1991)
State v. Broadhead
814 P.2d 401 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1991)
State v. Romero
815 P.2d 459 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1991)