State v. Griffin

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Griffin

570 S.W.3d 681

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 2, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106092

StatusPublished

This text of 570 S.W.3d 681 (State v. Griffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Griffin, 570 S.W.3d 681 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Marlon Griffin ("Appellant") appeals from his conviction, following a jury trial, of first-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.020 RSMo., armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015, and distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211. Appellant, a persistent offender, was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole and concurrent terms of imprisonment of fifteen and seven years, respectively.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose *682would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Marlon Griffin ("Appellant") appeals from his conviction, following a jury trial, of first-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.020 RSMo., armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015, and distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211. Appellant, a persistent offender, was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole and concurrent terms of imprisonment of fifteen and seven years, respectively.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose *682would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

570 S.W.3d 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-griffin-moctapp-2019.