State v. Griffin

81 S.W.3d 681, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1451, 2002 WL 1419641
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Griffin. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1515
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 2, 2002·No. No. ED 80120·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Henry Griffin, appeals from the judgment entered upon his felony stealing conviction. The defendant alleges the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress identification, and in overruling his objections to two different portions of the police officer’s testimony on redirect examination. Finding no error, we deny each of the defendant’s allegations of error. The judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Griffin, 81 S.W.3d 681, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1451, 2002 WL 1419641 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

81 S.W.3d 681 (State v. Griffin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.