State v. Griffin

831 A.2d 252, 265 Conn. 910, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 367
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 4, 2003·No. SC 17052·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 77 Conn. App. 424 (AC 23271), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly determined: (a) that a State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058, 118 S. Ct. 1384, 140 L. Ed. 2d 645 (1998), hearing was required; and (b) that its application properly resulted in the exclusion of Dr. Madelon Baranoski’s testimony?”

Moira L. Buckley, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Christopher T. Godialis, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided September 4, 2003

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Griffin, 831 A.2d 252, 265 Conn. 910, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 367 (Colo. 2003).

831 A.2d 252 (State v. Griffin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Griffin
869 A.2d 640 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)