State v. Grier
This text of 2019 Ohio 331 (State v. Grier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Grier, 2019-Ohio-331.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO
STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2018-P-0102 - vs - :
LARRY D. GRIER, :
Defendant-Appellant. :
Criminal Appeal from the Portage County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2015 CR 00043.
Judgment: Appeal dismissed.
Victor V. Vigluicci, Portage County Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
Larry D. Grier, pro se, PID: A672-442, Marion Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 57, 940 Marion-Williamsport Road, Marion, OH 43302 (Defendant-Appellant).
TIMOTHY P. CANNON, J.
{¶1} This matter is before this court on the pro se motion for leave of appellant,
Larry D. Grier, to file a delayed appeal, pursuant to App.R. 5(A). Along with his motion,
appellant filed his notice of appeal in the trial court on December 12, 2018.
{¶2} Appellant appeals from the trial court’s entry of August 5, 2015, convicting
him of trafficking in heroin and failure to comply and sentencing him to serve 10 years in
prison and a 5-year license suspension. {¶3} A timely notice of appeal from the August 5, 2015 judgment entry was due
no later than September 4, 2015, which is not a weekend or a holiday. Thus,
appellant’s appeal is untimely by over three years.
{¶4} No brief or memorandum in opposition to appellant’s motion has been
filed.
{¶5} App.R. 4(A)(1) states, in part:
{¶6} “* * * [A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its
entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within thirty days of that entry.”
{¶7} App.R. 5(A) provides:
{¶8} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for
the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with
leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:
{¶9} “(a) Criminal proceedings;
{¶10} “(b) Delinquency proceedings; and
{¶11} “(c) Serious youthful offender proceedings.
{¶12} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals
and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of
right. Concurrently with the filing of the motion, the movant shall file with the clerk of the
trial court a notice of appeal in the form prescribed by App.R. 3 and shall file a copy of
the notice of the appeal in the court of appeals.”
{¶13} In his motion, appellant asserts that he just learned of his appellate rights
while in prison, and neither the trial court nor his trial counsel advised him of those
rights.
2 {¶14} While appellant’s reason might justify a reasonable delay of time in filing
his appeal, given the length of time of over three years before initiating an appeal, it is
evident that appellant was not diligent in taking the proper steps to protect his own
{¶15} Accordingly, it is ordered that appellant’s motion for leave to file a delayed
appeal is hereby overruled.
{¶16} Appeal dismissed.
THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J.,
DIANE V. GRENDELL, J.,
concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 Ohio 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-grier-ohioctapp-2019.