State v. Griddine

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Griddine

426 S.W.3d 730, 2014 WL 1377585, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 392

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 8, 2014·No. No. WD 76160·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Deanthony Griddine appeals his convictions and sentences, following a jury trial, for unlawful use of a weapon, under section 571.030, and armed criminal action, under section 571.015. Griddine claims that there is insufficient evidence to support his convictions because the State’s evidence demonstrated only that he stood in the street and shot a firearm at a motor vehicle, and section 571.030.1(9) was enacted to criminalize the act of shooting a firearm from a motor vehicle, not at a motor vehicle. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Deanthony Griddine appeals his convictions and sentences, following a jury trial, for unlawful use of a weapon, under section 571.030, and armed criminal action, under section 571.015. Griddine claims that there is insufficient evidence to support his convictions because the State’s evidence demonstrated only that he stood in the street and shot a firearm at a motor vehicle, and section 571.030.1(9) was enacted to criminalize the act of shooting a firearm from a motor vehicle, not at a motor vehicle. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Griddine, 426 S.W.3d 730, 2014 WL 1377585, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 392 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

426 S.W.3d 730 (State v. Griddine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.