State v. Greisdorf

610 So. 2d 734, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13593, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 146
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Greisdorf. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8376
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 1992·No. No. 90-2648·Published

Opinion

AMENDED OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

By our Opinion on Motion for Rehearing of October 27, 1991, we denied rehearing but granted a stay of the mandate pending a decision in Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992). The opinion in that case having now been issued, we grant rehearing in the present case, recall our original opinion of August 28, 1991, 587 So.2d 1153, and affirm the sentencing order rendered by the lower tribunal.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Greisdorf, 610 So. 2d 734, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13593, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 146 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

610 So. 2d 734 (State v. Greisdorf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scates v. State
603 So. 2d 504 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
State v. Greisdorf
587 So. 2d 1153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)