State v. Greisdorf

610 So. 2d 734, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13593, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 146
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 30, 1992
DocketNo. 90-2648
StatusPublished

This text of 610 So. 2d 734 (State v. Greisdorf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Greisdorf, 610 So. 2d 734, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13593, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 146 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

AMENDED OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

By our Opinion on Motion for Rehearing of October 27, 1991, we denied rehearing but granted a stay of the mandate pending a decision in Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992). The opinion in that case having now been issued, we grant rehearing in the present case, recall our original opinion of August 28, 1991, 587 So.2d 1153, and affirm the sentencing order rendered by the lower tribunal.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scates v. State
603 So. 2d 504 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
State v. Greisdorf
587 So. 2d 1153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
610 So. 2d 734, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13593, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-greisdorf-fladistctapp-1992.