State v. Gregory

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Gregory

218 S.W.3d 555, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 162, 2007 WL 220232

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 30, 2007·No. ED 87351·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rainey Gregory (“Defendant”) appeals from his conviction on one count of manu- *556 factoring methamphetamine, two counts of resisting arrest and one count of assaulting a law enforcement officer.

Defendant claims only one point on appeal. He alleges that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized in his apartment because the police officer did not have a search warrant.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rainey Gregory (“Defendant”) appeals from his conviction on one count of manu- *556 factoring methamphetamine, two counts of resisting arrest and one count of assaulting a law enforcement officer.

Defendant claims only one point on appeal. He alleges that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized in his apartment because the police officer did not have a search warrant.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Gregory, 218 S.W.3d 555, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 162, 2007 WL 220232 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

218 S.W.3d 555 (State v. Gregory) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.