State v. Gregg

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Gregg

152 Mont. 12

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 27, 1968

DocketNO. 29

StatusPublished

This text of 152 Mont. 12 (State v. Gregg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gregg, 152 Mont. 12 (Mo. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of life, imposed on the 20th day of May, 1960, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that:

(1) The sentence be reduced to 45 years.

The reason for the above decision is that this prisoner, sentenced to life for second degree murder, has no prior criminal record, is now 73 years of age and has spent the last eight years in prison where his record is that his progress is average and above, and that his work habits, attitude towards supervision and authority is good.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Victor H. Fall, chairman; Philip Duncan, Paul G. Hatfield.

The action taken herein is not to be construed as being any indication whatever that the Sentence Review Division feels the same should influence, in any way, any other official, Board or person.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of life, imposed on the 20th day of May, 1960, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that:

(1) The sentence be reduced to 45 years.

The reason for the above decision is that this prisoner, sentenced to life for second degree murder, has no prior criminal record, is now 73 years of age and has spent the last eight years in prison where his record is that his progress is average and above, and that his work habits, attitude towards supervision and authority is good.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Victor H. Fall, chairman; Philip Duncan, Paul G. Hatfield.

The action taken herein is not to be construed as being any indication whatever that the Sentence Review Division feels the same should influence, in any way, any other official, Board or person.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 Mont. 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gregg-mont-1968.